header image
Recent Comments
Blogs I Read
Archives
The Baptist Top 1000
[ # ] Baptist Leader for “Fixing” Gay Fetuses
March 10th, 2007 under Baptists, ChristianWalk, violence

mohler.jpgAl Mohler, president of The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, recently wrote an article, Is Your Baby Gay? What If You Could Know? What If You Could Do Something About It?.

In the article he states the following:

If a biological basis is found, and if a prenatal test is then developed, and if a successful treatment to reverse the sexual orientation to heterosexual is ever developed, we would support its use as we should unapologetically support the use of any appropriate means to avoid sexual temptation and the inevitable effects of sin.

Questions–

Does “we” mean Southern Baptists? Seems kind of presumptuous of Al, but that’s pretty par for the course.

Using science to alleviate sin? This is the same guy that denies evolution. See irony here? Why not rely on God’s grace and power to deliver one from “sin”? Why isn’t that sufficient?

What if we found the “sin” gene? What if we located a religion gene? Should we then tweek it to make all persons Christians?

The church has been wrong about a lot of issues. What if we fix all these babies and we are wrong about homosexuality? OOOPS! What’s really sad is that folks like Mohler don’t see altering someone’s God-given genes as an act of violence. Imperialism has a way of blinding you to your own arrogance and sinfulness. Those native americans didn’t know what was best for them did they Al? Those Iraqis needed liberating too didn’t they?

I’m glad that folks like Mohler aren’t God, even though they think they are. And I’m glad that God isn’t like folks like Mohler!


Read the Comments

[ # 36349 ] Comment from Michael Westmoreland-White [March 11, 2007, 9:13 pm]

I predicted this kind of “final solution” would occur to fundamentalists soon. I also believe that finding such a “gay gene” (likely a combination influences the orientation) will be possible long before any manipulation will–so “pro-life” conservatives will suddenly support selective abortions–for fetuses that will likely become gay. In fact, the fear of “designer kids” has made me more conservative on abortion than before.

[ # 36350 ] Comment from Cathy [March 21, 2007, 2:54 pm]

Any manipulation of a gene to prevent the expression of a gay gene or simply the detection of one would require a needle to be placed into the placental fluid at least. Such a maneuver would have (or in the past had) a rate of 1 in 200 fetal loss. The result (including unintended results) of such experimentation would then not be entirely clear for at least twenty to fifty years.

The risk of carrying a fetus that could become a gay adult would have to be individually calculated and it would because of the above stated risk have to be at least greater than 1/200. Determining risk would be very difficult until such a gene was isolated and members of the general public willing to disclose their sexual preferences and provide genetic material for testing were studied in large numbers.

No Institutional Review Board would consider such testing or experimentation to be ethical given the fact that it would be hard in todays climate to suggest that a great deal of harm or disability would be the result of doing nothing.

I agree that gayness is probably more determined by a combination of gene affects and complex pychosocial influences and as much as we may want to control that it is not likely to happen in this life.

Mohler should stick to disertations on Calvinism. In some minds a gay person would probably not be a predestined person so abortion might seem a kind alternative to some. I won’t speak for Mohler.

[ # 36351 ] Comment from Michelle [April 8, 2007, 7:10 pm]

So, let me get this straight. There’s only ONE reason in the entire world that it is NOT ok to kill a pre-born child? As the pro-aborts are fond of saying regularly “Who are YOU to decide for ANY woman what to do with her body?” But, it’s ok to kill a pre-born child because he or she will grow up poor or fatherless or adopted or with a mental or physical disability?

I am laughing my butt off at some of the comments from “pro-choice” people who are also “pro-gay”. Some of them are verbatim from pro-life organization sites. They fail to see the irony in their “suddenly offended” objections. The horror of the gay community is understandable, yet the pro-aborts have consistently discounted the same objections to abortion that disability advocate groups have had for decades. NO ONE has the right to decide whether a life is worthy of being lived…except God.

Quite a dilemma, no? The hypocrisy is overwhelming yet predictable, and I’m watching closely to see how the pro-aborts handle this one.

Write a comment






Flickr
www.flickr.com
howieluvzus' photos More of howieluvzus' photos

Recent Posts
Categories
Save This Page